PROFESSOR DOUGLAS Boateng, the South Africa-based Ghanaian Professor of UNISA Graduate School of Business Leadership (SBL) in South Africa, one of the emerging world’s Premier and the continent’s largest postgraduate leadership development School, has noted that Ghana’s electoral Supply chain urgently needs major overhauling.
He has recommended for immediate consideration the hiring of supply chain experts at the highest level into the Electoral Commission (EC) to increase its value chain understanding and service delivery effectiveness.
The Supply chain expert further suggested that decision makers from all sides of the political spectrum will have to agree and initiate and institute major electoral chain reforms that will be able to withstand the pressures arising from an increasingly sophisticated and demanding electorate, especially in 2016.
Prof. Boateng, who is President of the Institute of Operations Management Africa and chairs the Chartered Institute of Purchasing and Supply Africa Advisory Board made the recommendation in the light of the August 29, 2013 Supreme Court ruling .
He said in spite of the calmness in the wake and aftermath of the Supreme Court ruling, the truth still remains that Ghana’s electoral supply chain urgently needs major reforms to avoid another potential crisis in 2016 and beyond.
Prof. Boateng, the first ever professor extraordinaire for Supply Chain and Value Chain management by the UNISA Graduate School of Business Leadership (SBL), one of Africa’s largest and most respected leadership development schools, indicated that the reforms are necessary to avoid another costly and potentially damaging electoral supply chain management against the fact that the next election will definitely provide even much more tougher test for both the EC and Ghana’s relatively young democracy.
According to the supply chain expert, there is genuine cause for concern if the 2004, 2008 and 2012 elections are used as benchmark for what could potentially happen in 2016.
“If there are no concrete supply chain driven actions, our beloved country men may not be so lucky next time round”, Prof. Boateng cautioned.
The renowned Professor’s concern was premised on the ineffective electoral supply chain management which he said caused the election petition and cautioned against ignoring the fact that the election petition hearing which he described as “a whole avoidable saga” had cost the country a fortune in lost productivity, good will and local direct investment which will take several years to potentially recoup noting further that the cost on the Ghanaian psyche is also immeasurable.
Prof. Boateng, who is also the chairman of the Africa Strategic Advisory Board of the Chartered Institute of Purchasing and Supply (CIPS), the world’s largest professional body representing the procurement and supply chain management profession, pointed out that a close observation of the court proceedings indicated a facial demonstration of lack of electoral supply chain management understanding by the duly authorized representative of EC.
According to him, the Supreme Court ruling in no way absolves the EC of their relatively poor display of understanding of their fiduciary responsibility in the face of service quality, electoral logistics, procurement and supply chain management during cross examination at the election petition hearing.
Prof. Boateng said the fact that tension had risen to unacceptable levels among the people in the last four elections was indicative that the electorate was not fully satisfied with the services rendered by the EC hence he need for decision makers to consider the proposed reforms in supply chain management at the EC.
Meanwhile, Prof. Boateng has congratulated President John Mahama and Nana Addo Danquah Akufo-Addo for their nobility in the face of the unfortunate crisis caused by a comparatively ineffective electoral supply chain management system.
He commended the two leaders of the two main political parties for acknowledging the fact that the peaceful triumph was for Ghana and not any political party or individual.